Recorded demonstration evidence: these results were captured from the private scanner on 9 August 2026. This public view contains demonstration data only.
Accessibility assurance overview
Evidence you can explain, not just a score.
A public, read-only view of how BarrierTrace can organise automated signals, review status and evidence across a small portfolio.
Demonstration posture
3 controlled sitesKnown inputs · repeatable comparisonControlled portfolio
Accessibility review
Review a site to see the wider evidence model behind the headline scores.
Example One: Community SupportStrong baseline100%00Review evidence
Evidence summary
No automated findings were recorded on the scanned page. Manual review is still required.
The dashboard retains a sanitised summary of this controlled run. CWAC is one input alongside browser checks, human review, framework mapping and an auditable evidence history.
Automated rulesContent advisoryManual verificationFramework mapping
- Automated scan
- Recorded
- CWAC score
- 0 lower is better
- Automated health
- 100%
- Test coverage
- 90%
- Manual review
- Not completed
- Conformance claim
- None
Under the hood
Criterion-level evidence preview
A full review can retain affected pages, rule evidence, manual observations, assistive-technology context, revisions and governance mappings. Example detail is softened here because this is the public view.
The detailed example records are visually obscured. They represent criterion-level findings, manual checks and retained evidence history.
Example Two: Events CentreSome barriers33%101Review evidence
Evidence summary
The controlled scan recorded 10 automated findings on the page.
The dashboard retains a sanitised summary of this controlled run. CWAC is one input alongside browser checks, human review, framework mapping and an auditable evidence history.
Automated rulesContent advisoryManual verificationFramework mapping
- Automated scan
- Recorded
- CWAC score
- 100 lower is better
- Automated health
- 33%
- Test coverage
- 90%
- Manual review
- Not completed
- Conformance claim
- None
Under the hood
Criterion-level evidence preview
A full review can retain affected pages, rule evidence, manual observations, assistive-technology context, revisions and governance mappings. Example detail is softened here because this is the public view.
The detailed example records are visually obscured. They represent criterion-level findings, manual checks and retained evidence history.
Example Three: Rapid ServicesMany barriers33%221Review evidence
Evidence summary
The controlled scan recorded 22 automated findings on the page.
The dashboard retains a sanitised summary of this controlled run. CWAC is one input alongside browser checks, human review, framework mapping and an auditable evidence history.
Automated rulesContent advisoryManual verificationFramework mapping
- Automated scan
- Recorded
- CWAC score
- 100 lower is better
- Automated health
- 33%
- Test coverage
- 90%
- Manual review
- Not completed
- Conformance claim
- None
Under the hood
Criterion-level evidence preview
A full review can retain affected pages, rule evidence, manual observations, assistive-technology context, revisions and governance mappings. Example detail is softened here because this is the public view.
The detailed example records are visually obscured. They represent criterion-level findings, manual checks and retained evidence history.
The BarrierTrace approach
Automated signals are the start of the evidence trail.
Detect
Capture repeatable automated signals and affected pages.
Review
Add human judgement, context and manual testing evidence.
Assure
Track what was checked, what changed and what remains open.